The documents also reveal that the father has a criminal record and is on probation for domestic abuse. She testified that she is more “comfortable” with Petitioner. She further testified that she feels manipulated at times by Respondent. The Child expressed her view that Respondent does not listen to her feelings and makes her feel insecure at times. The Child expressed her wishes to remain with Petitioner during the school year. In the age of #MeToo and #BelieveWomen, why are girls ignored and silenced and sent back to alleged abusers in Zellweger’s courtroom?Ĭourt documents reveal that the minor was candid in court.Īs planned, the GAL conducted examination of the Child in camera. Zellweger still ruled to send her to live with the father full-time, in spite of the allegations of abuse the child made in Montana and in her own courtroom. When the child went to visit her mother for Christmas, she disclosed the allegation and refused to go back. The child reported the alleged abuse to her school counselor and Child Protective Services in Montana (where she lived with her father) filed a report, but her allegations fell on deaf ears. But if only the child and the abuser were there at the time of the molestation, what evidence would there be, other than the child’s word? “You don’t understand, you’re just going to force me to go with a child molester.”Īt that point a male voice jumped in and scolded the child to be quiet with a loud “No!” and the minor fell silent while the judge repeated to the young girl that her story doesn’t matter in the eyes of the court because Zellweger didn’t hear any evidence of the molestation. “I have a personal experience,” she said, begging. “This is what I’m telling you,” continued the child while sobbing. Texas Family Courts Under Fire From Angry Parents: ‘Our Confidence in the Judiciary Is at an All-Time Low’
“There’s no evidence…” Zellweger interrupted the minor’s plea. “I told you that he was touching me and you’re still going to make me go with him?” “I still don’t understand,” said the minor. “We can do it the easy way or we can do it the hard way,” Zellweger said. When the child refused to consent, the judge continued threatening to arrest her mother. The judge replied, “When your mom is taken to jail you will have no other parent to live with but dad…I understand you’re not happy with the court’s judgment.” The child, in obvious distress, pleaded with Zellweger, “I don’t want to live with him.”
#Jydge secret area free
“She has free will but her free will can end up putting her in jail,” Zellweger says. In the recording above, Zellweger can be heard telling the minor child that Freiner’s freedom is at stake if the child doesn’t cooperate. In return, Zellweger tried to coerce the daughter to comply, threatening to jail her mother for contempt. The audio is hard to hear, but it’s very plain that the minor child is in distress and begging the adults around her to take her concerns seriously. In the video, the minor child begs the judge not to send her to live with the man she says is a child molester.
The minor at the center of the controversy recorded a hearing on her smartphone, which got into the hands of investigative journalist Michael Volpe, who posted it on YouTube. Louis, Mo., family court judge, Nicole Zellweger, has launched an all-out judicial assault on Angela Freiner and her minor daughter, who are refusing her order to make the 14-year-old girl return to the man who she says sexually molested her.
0 kommentar(er)
